GOAL's Case Law Page
Listing of Firearms Related Court Cases
- United States v. Masciandaro
- United States v. Chester
- Cite as MacNutt v. Police Commissioner of Boston
- Cite as Alexander Rzeznik v. Police Chief of Southampton
- Cite as Chief of Police of Shelburne v. Moyer
- Cite as Ruggiero v. Police Commissioner of Boston
- Cite as COMMONWEALTH of MA v. PAUL R. COUTURE
- Cite as Commonwealth of MA. v. Davis
- Cite as Commonwealth of MA v. Tina Boe
- CIte as Commonwealth of MA. v. Thomas Young & another. (1)
- Cite as Commonwealth of MA. v. Richard Runyan
- Cite as Commonwealth of MA. v. Aaron Powell
- TERRY v. OHIO. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
- Washington State v. Sieyes
Historical U.S. Supreme Court Firearms Cases/Decisions
- United States v. Cruikshank et al. (from 1876, arguably the worst decision ever made by the United States Supreme Court, still used today to keep the 2nd Amendment from being incorporated as a right in many states)
- Presser v. Illinois, 116 U.S. 252 (1886). Although the Supreme Court affirmed the holding in Cruikshank that the Second Amendment, standing alone, applied only to action by the federal government, it nonetheless found the states without power to infringe upon the right to keep and bear arms, holding that "the States cannot, even laying the constitutional provision in question out of view, prohibit the people from keeping and bearing arms, as so to deprive the United States of their rightful resource for maintaining the public security and disable the people from performing their duty to the general government."
- Miller v. Texas, 153 U.S. 535 (1894). In this case, the Court confirmed that it had never addressed the issue of the Second Amendment applying to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. This case remains the last word on this subject by the Court.
- United States v. Miller 33˜44(From 1939 the first Supreme Court Decision to directly address the Second Amendment)
- Lewis v. United States, 445 U.S. 95 (1980). Lewis recognized--in summarizing the holding of Miller, supra, as "the Second Amendment guarantees no right to keep and bear a firearm that does not have 'some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia'" (emphasis added)--that Miller had focused upon the type of firearm. Further, Lewis was concerned only with whether the provision of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 which prohibits the possession of firearms by convicted felons (codified in 18 U.S.C. 922(g) in 1986) violated the Second Amendment. Thus, since convicted felons historically were and are subject to the loss of numerous fundamental rights of citizenship --including the right to vote, hold office, and serve on juries--it was not erroneous for the Court to have concluded that laws prohibiting the possession of firearms by a convicted felon "are neither based upon constitutionally suspect criteria, nor do they trench upon any constitutionally protected liberties."
- United States v. Verdugo-Urquirdez, 110 S. Ct. 3039 (1990). This case involved the meaning of the term "the people" in the Fourth Amendment. The Court unanimously held that the term "the people" in the Second Amendment had the same meaning as in the Preamble to the Constitution and in the First, Fourth, and Ninth Amendments, i.e., that "the people" means at least all citizens and legal aliens while in the United States. This case thus resolves any doubt that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right.
- Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana v. United States. 33˜44 (1996-97) Supreme Court case challenging background checks implemented by the Brady Bill
- Heller v. District of Columbia. Answering a 217-year old constitutional question, the Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to have a gun, at least in one’s home. The Court, splitting 5-4, struck down a District of Columbia ban on handgun possession. Although times have changed since 1791, Justice Antonin Scalia said for the majority, “it is not the role of this Court to pronounce the Second Amendment extinct.” Read the full Heller decicion here.
- McDonald v. Chicago. Building on Heller, the Supreme Court grants incorporation of the Second Amendment to all states. A landmark decision that finally, properly, recognizes the Second Amendment as a Civil Right. McDonald V. Chicago Full transcript of Supreme Court Hearing
- Caetano v. Massachusetts. The Supreme Court orders the MA Supreme Judicial Court to revisit an unconstitutional decision in a case regarding stun gun possession. The Court has held that “the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding,”
*This page is made possible by the membership of GOAL and their generous donations. If you found this page helpful please Join - Support - Donate to GOAL.